|
|
|
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
|
|
7:30 am - 8:30 am
|
|
|
8:30 am - 8:45 am
|
|
|
8:45 am - 9:35 am
|
|
|
9:35 am - 10:25 am
|
Discuss Divided Infringement and the Implications of Limelight v. Akamai |
Due to the rulings of Limelight v. Akamai, along with other recent cases, applicants must adhere to more stringent requirements to ensure claims have
appropriate focus.
- Explore Limelight v. Akamai and other divided infringement cases
- Uncover claiming strategies in light of these decisions
- Discuss potential changes based on pending or future cases
|
|
|
Tanzina Chowdhury
IP Counsel
Entegris, Inc.
|
|
Anthony Mustillo
Senior Patent Attorney
Endo Pharmaceuticals and Healthtronics
|
|
Nathan Weber
Partner
Carter, DeLuca, Farrell & Schmidt, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
10:25 am - 10:55 am
|
|
|
10:55 am - 11:45 am
|
Navigate Patent Eligibility Issues After Alice |
There have been a tidal wave of decisions from the Federal Circuit, District Courts, and Patent Office invalidating patents on patent-eligibility grounds
since the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corporation v. CLS Bank International. While some computer implemented inventions have survived,
understanding how to disclose and draft claims to survive patent-eligibility challenges is becoming more and more difficult. This panel addresses:
- How the new test is being applied by the Courts and the PTAB
- What types of claims have survived patent-eligibility challenges and why
- The new forums where patent-eligibility challenges are being raised
|
| Moderator: |
|
|
| Panelists: |
|
Mony R. Ghose
Associate Chief Intellectual Property Counsel
Becton, Dickinson and Company
|
|
|
|
Jay Knobloch
Director, IP Licensing and Litigation
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
11:45 am - 12:35 pm
|
Explore the Monetization of Intellectual Property |
- Define IP monetization and what it should involve and include
- Discover the numerous ways IP can be monetized and what it can produce
- Examine multiple types of monetization agreements, focusing on IP licensing terms and conditions and potential issues that may arise
|
|
Richard Weiss
Chief IP Counsel
NCR Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
12:35 pm - 1:50 pm
|
|
|
1:50 pm - 2:40 pm
|
Understand the Impact of Federalization of Trade Secret Law |
- Discuss the interaction between federal and state trade secret law
- Explore ways to keep corporate information confidential and enhance your patent program
- Uncover how to use trade secrets to enforce corporate goals
- Examine best practices for an internal program
|
|
|
Joe O. Long
Managing Counsel
Wells Fargo Legal Group
|
|
|
|
|
2:40 pm - 3:30 pm
|
|
|
3:30 pm - 4:00 pm
|
|
|
4:00 pm - 4:50 pm
|
Determine When to Use Outside Counsel on IP Matters |
Not all IP matters can be resolved in house, and it is difficult to determine when to bring in outside assistance and how to work together successfully.
- Debate scenarios where outside counsel should be engaged to work with in house counsel
- Discover how to collaborate with outside counsel to meet the goals of the organization
- Enhance partnerships with foreign counsel in prosecution matters
|
|
|
Joe O. Long
Managing Counsel
Wells Fargo Legal Group
|
|
|
Philip Soo, PhD
Intellectual Property Counsel
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4:50 pm - 5:40 pm
|
|
Roundtable #1
Overcome IP Issues in Negotiating Contracts
|
|
|
Roundtable #2
Enforce IP Rights in Social Media |
Roundtable #3
Discuss the Use of Native Advertising Across Platforms |
|
|
|
5:40 pm - 6:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|